Time Left - 10:00 mins

English quiz on Para Jumble & Fill in the Blanks

Attempt now to get your rank among 2930 students!

Question 1

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
What is the author trying to express in passage given above?

Question 2

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following statements is TRUE according to the passage?
(1) Imports in India rose by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015.
(2) Exports in India fell by 16.7% in April-August 2015.
(3) Non-oil imports in India rose by in this fiscal year.

Question 3

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
What are the problems faced by the manufacturing industry according to the passage?

Question 4

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following statements is NOT TRUE according to the passage?
(1) India is vulnerable to the falling prices of Oil and Iron ore.
(2) Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports growth led to the decline in investment in India.
(3) Low tariff on machines and capital subsidy on textiles helped in increasing Indian exports.

Question 5

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following express the SIMILAR meaning of the word “Scupper” as given in the passage?

Question 6

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following express the SIMILAR meaning of the word “Tepid” as given in the passage?

Question 7

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following express the SIMILAR meaning of the word “Infirmities” as given in the passage?

Question 8

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following express the OPPOSITE meaning of the word “Reconciled” as given in the passage?

Question 9

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following express the OPPOSITE meaning of the word “Vulnerabilities” as given in the passage?

Question 10

Direction: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.

The Modi government is doing its utmost to stir up global investment interest in India. But in doing so, it should not overlook ecosystem flaws that can scupper its ‘Make in India’ programme. India’s recent trade data, for instance, raises some serious questions. An obvious one: How can a scenario of falling exports and imports be readily reconciled with one of a buoyant, promising economy? For optimists, it is possible that the slower fall in imports since March — as against imports falling more steeply than exports in the first three months of the calendar year — points to a recovery, coinciding with a tepid improvement in factory output. Imports in dollar terms fell by 11.6 per cent in April-August 2015, whereas exports dipped by 16.7 per cent. Interestingly, non-oil imports rose 3.4 per cent this fiscal, but here researchers point to a revival in gold imports as a driver! While it is true that falling global demand for commodities and finished goods has dragged down both imports and exports, this assessment overlooks crucial details. Analysts have pointed out that India’s exports have done worse than Asian economies since late 2014, implying that infirmities specific to Indian manufacturing, which make up two-thirds of the export basket, are a major concern. Manufacturing exports slumped to single digit growth after 2012 and finally ended up in negative territory this calendar year; this was against a growth rate of 23 per cent in 2003-08. A government committed to ‘Make in India’ should take a structural view of this crisis as it seeks to revive investment.
Researchers have observed that India, with a major composition of commodities in its export basket, has been hurt by the fall in oil and iron ore prices, displaying vulnerabilities similar to Russia and Brazil. Capital intensive commodity and engineering exports have been growing their share since 2000 at the expense of textiles, readymade garments, leather, and gems and jewellery. This led to an investment boom in 2004-09 (with technology up-gradation, however, happening only in the odd sector such as automobiles), but it is also a counter-intuitive strategy for a labour-abundant country. While looking at labour reforms, it is also worth considering whether low tariffs on machinery imports, as well as a capital subsidy for textiles, contributed to ‘jobless (export) growth’.
‘Make in India’ calls for an assessment of whether free trade pacts, in force for a decade, have helped industry and exports — at a time when agreements such as RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) are being negotiated. Recent signals from New Delhi have been confusing. After a high-profile meeting with leaders of domestic industry, there have been reports that India will slash tariffs on over 40 per cent of its imports from China. An intelligent approach to openness, which China has perfected over time, can serve us well. While India should focus on the domestic economy when the global situation is bleak, foreign trade policy is no less crucial.

Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com
Which among the following express the OPPOSITE meaning of the word “Bleak” as given in the passage?
  • 2930 attempts
  • 23 upvotes
  • 186 comments
Apr 26PO, Clerk, SO, Insurance