Attempt now to get your rank among 925 students!
Question 1
The Vyapam scam in Madhya Pradesh can no longer be considered just another corruption scandal of the conventional sort. It appears to be unique in combining the average fraudster’s ability to manipulate systems, with the reach and ruthlessness of an organised mafia-like group that can eliminate inconvenient suspects and witnesses. From being a set of inter-linked corruption cases involving the manipulation of tests for admission to professional courses and government recruitments, the scandal has emerged as a hydra-headed monster consuming over 40 lives so far.
New questions stem from the unexplained deaths, including that of a television journalist who collapsed mysteriously shortly after interviewing the parents of a medical student who had been found dead on a railway track three years ago. The State government has admitted that nearly two dozen of those who were within the ambit of the probe had died unnatural deaths, and that many of them were between 25 and 30, with ‘road accident’ being cited as the leading cause of death. An elaborate conspiracy to subvert the investigation and trial can be the only credible explanation for the string of deaths. The magnitude of the cover-up appears to have overshadowed the extent of the original scandal.
Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s move to approach the High Court to seek to hand over the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation is but a bid to pre-empt a potentially damaging order from the Supreme Court to that effect. Mr. Chouhan seems to have recognised that he needs to do something to shore up the credibility of his administration. Governor Ram Naresh Yadav himself being named in one of the FIRs should have jolted the State government into serious action. Within weeks, the Governor’s son, Shailesh Yadav, who was named by a witness as the recipient of some cash and a list of candidates, was dead.
The Union government’s silence on the Governor’s continuance in office is intriguing indeed. The death of Akshay Singh, the TV journalist, and new evidence that the police ignored an autopsy report that stated that Namrata Damor, a medical student and alleged beneficiary, died of strangulation, are further pointers to the fact that the investigation under the State government is vulnerable to interference, subversion and manipulation. Nearly 2,000 people have been booked and the kingpins and their accomplices arrested. What is needed now is an independent and comprehensive investigation into the cover-up and the wider conspiracy, if any, behind the series of deaths. It has to be determined whether these were engineered to protect someone. Such a probe will have to be done under the Supreme Court’s vigilant eye. This outrageous chapter has to come to an end.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com
(1) Increased number of deaths of people involved or investigating the scam
(2) There has been a new finding in the on-going process of investigation
(3) The state and the police is often witnessed to be manipulative and corrupt
Question 2
The Vyapam scam in Madhya Pradesh can no longer be considered just another corruption scandal of the conventional sort. It appears to be unique in combining the average fraudster’s ability to manipulate systems, with the reach and ruthlessness of an organised mafia-like group that can eliminate inconvenient suspects and witnesses. From being a set of inter-linked corruption cases involving the manipulation of tests for admission to professional courses and government recruitments, the scandal has emerged as a hydra-headed monster consuming over 40 lives so far.
New questions stem from the unexplained deaths, including that of a television journalist who collapsed mysteriously shortly after interviewing the parents of a medical student who had been found dead on a railway track three years ago. The State government has admitted that nearly two dozen of those who were within the ambit of the probe had died unnatural deaths, and that many of them were between 25 and 30, with ‘road accident’ being cited as the leading cause of death. An elaborate conspiracy to subvert the investigation and trial can be the only credible explanation for the string of deaths. The magnitude of the cover-up appears to have overshadowed the extent of the original scandal.
Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s move to approach the High Court to seek to hand over the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation is but a bid to pre-empt a potentially damaging order from the Supreme Court to that effect. Mr. Chouhan seems to have recognised that he needs to do something to shore up the credibility of his administration. Governor Ram Naresh Yadav himself being named in one of the FIRs should have jolted the State government into serious action. Within weeks, the Governor’s son, Shailesh Yadav, who was named by a witness as the recipient of some cash and a list of candidates, was dead.
The Union government’s silence on the Governor’s continuance in office is intriguing indeed. The death of Akshay Singh, the TV journalist, and new evidence that the police ignored an autopsy report that stated that Namrata Damor, a medical student and alleged beneficiary, died of strangulation, are further pointers to the fact that the investigation under the State government is vulnerable to interference, subversion and manipulation. Nearly 2,000 people have been booked and the kingpins and their accomplices arrested. What is needed now is an independent and comprehensive investigation into the cover-up and the wider conspiracy, if any, behind the series of deaths. It has to be determined whether these were engineered to protect someone. Such a probe will have to be done under the Supreme Court’s vigilant eye. This outrageous chapter has to come to an end.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com
Question 3
The Vyapam scam in Madhya Pradesh can no longer be considered just another corruption scandal of the conventional sort. It appears to be unique in combining the average fraudster’s ability to manipulate systems, with the reach and ruthlessness of an organised mafia-like group that can eliminate inconvenient suspects and witnesses. From being a set of inter-linked corruption cases involving the manipulation of tests for admission to professional courses and government recruitments, the scandal has emerged as a hydra-headed monster consuming over 40 lives so far.
New questions stem from the unexplained deaths, including that of a television journalist who collapsed mysteriously shortly after interviewing the parents of a medical student who had been found dead on a railway track three years ago. The State government has admitted that nearly two dozen of those who were within the ambit of the probe had died unnatural deaths, and that many of them were between 25 and 30, with ‘road accident’ being cited as the leading cause of death. An elaborate conspiracy to subvert the investigation and trial can be the only credible explanation for the string of deaths. The magnitude of the cover-up appears to have overshadowed the extent of the original scandal.
Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s move to approach the High Court to seek to hand over the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation is but a bid to pre-empt a potentially damaging order from the Supreme Court to that effect. Mr. Chouhan seems to have recognised that he needs to do something to shore up the credibility of his administration. Governor Ram Naresh Yadav himself being named in one of the FIRs should have jolted the State government into serious action. Within weeks, the Governor’s son, Shailesh Yadav, who was named by a witness as the recipient of some cash and a list of candidates, was dead.
The Union government’s silence on the Governor’s continuance in office is intriguing indeed. The death of Akshay Singh, the TV journalist, and new evidence that the police ignored an autopsy report that stated that Namrata Damor, a medical student and alleged beneficiary, died of strangulation, are further pointers to the fact that the investigation under the State government is vulnerable to interference, subversion and manipulation. Nearly 2,000 people have been booked and the kingpins and their accomplices arrested. What is needed now is an independent and comprehensive investigation into the cover-up and the wider conspiracy, if any, behind the series of deaths. It has to be determined whether these were engineered to protect someone. Such a probe will have to be done under the Supreme Court’s vigilant eye. This outrageous chapter has to come to an end.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com
Question 4
The Vyapam scam in Madhya Pradesh can no longer be considered just another corruption scandal of the conventional sort. It appears to be unique in combining the average fraudster’s ability to manipulate systems, with the reach and ruthlessness of an organised mafia-like group that can eliminate inconvenient suspects and witnesses. From being a set of inter-linked corruption cases involving the manipulation of tests for admission to professional courses and government recruitments, the scandal has emerged as a hydra-headed monster consuming over 40 lives so far.
New questions stem from the unexplained deaths, including that of a television journalist who collapsed mysteriously shortly after interviewing the parents of a medical student who had been found dead on a railway track three years ago. The State government has admitted that nearly two dozen of those who were within the ambit of the probe had died unnatural deaths, and that many of them were between 25 and 30, with ‘road accident’ being cited as the leading cause of death. An elaborate conspiracy to subvert the investigation and trial can be the only credible explanation for the string of deaths. The magnitude of the cover-up appears to have overshadowed the extent of the original scandal.
Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s move to approach the High Court to seek to hand over the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation is but a bid to pre-empt a potentially damaging order from the Supreme Court to that effect. Mr. Chouhan seems to have recognised that he needs to do something to shore up the credibility of his administration. Governor Ram Naresh Yadav himself being named in one of the FIRs should have jolted the State government into serious action. Within weeks, the Governor’s son, Shailesh Yadav, who was named by a witness as the recipient of some cash and a list of candidates, was dead.
The Union government’s silence on the Governor’s continuance in office is intriguing indeed. The death of Akshay Singh, the TV journalist, and new evidence that the police ignored an autopsy report that stated that Namrata Damor, a medical student and alleged beneficiary, died of strangulation, are further pointers to the fact that the investigation under the State government is vulnerable to interference, subversion and manipulation. Nearly 2,000 people have been booked and the kingpins and their accomplices arrested. What is needed now is an independent and comprehensive investigation into the cover-up and the wider conspiracy, if any, behind the series of deaths. It has to be determined whether these were engineered to protect someone. Such a probe will have to be done under the Supreme Court’s vigilant eye. This outrageous chapter has to come to an end.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com
Question 5
The Vyapam scam in Madhya Pradesh can no longer be considered just another corruption scandal of the conventional sort. It appears to be unique in combining the average fraudster’s ability to manipulate systems, with the reach and ruthlessness of an organised mafia-like group that can eliminate inconvenient suspects and witnesses. From being a set of inter-linked corruption cases involving the manipulation of tests for admission to professional courses and government recruitments, the scandal has emerged as a hydra-headed monster consuming over 40 lives so far.
New questions stem from the unexplained deaths, including that of a television journalist who collapsed mysteriously shortly after interviewing the parents of a medical student who had been found dead on a railway track three years ago. The State government has admitted that nearly two dozen of those who were within the ambit of the probe had died unnatural deaths, and that many of them were between 25 and 30, with ‘road accident’ being cited as the leading cause of death. An elaborate conspiracy to subvert the investigation and trial can be the only credible explanation for the string of deaths. The magnitude of the cover-up appears to have overshadowed the extent of the original scandal.
Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s move to approach the High Court to seek to hand over the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation is but a bid to pre-empt a potentially damaging order from the Supreme Court to that effect. Mr. Chouhan seems to have recognised that he needs to do something to shore up the credibility of his administration. Governor Ram Naresh Yadav himself being named in one of the FIRs should have jolted the State government into serious action. Within weeks, the Governor’s son, Shailesh Yadav, who was named by a witness as the recipient of some cash and a list of candidates, was dead.
The Union government’s silence on the Governor’s continuance in office is intriguing indeed. The death of Akshay Singh, the TV journalist, and new evidence that the police ignored an autopsy report that stated that Namrata Damor, a medical student and alleged beneficiary, died of strangulation, are further pointers to the fact that the investigation under the State government is vulnerable to interference, subversion and manipulation. Nearly 2,000 people have been booked and the kingpins and their accomplices arrested. What is needed now is an independent and comprehensive investigation into the cover-up and the wider conspiracy, if any, behind the series of deaths. It has to be determined whether these were engineered to protect someone. Such a probe will have to be done under the Supreme Court’s vigilant eye. This outrageous chapter has to come to an end.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com
Question 6
Direction: Read the following information carefully and answer the following question: The Graph below shows profit and loss percentage of two companies in different years:
%profit= (Income-exp)x100/Exp
% loss= (Exp- Income)x100/Exp
Question 7
Direction: Read the following information carefully and answer the following question: The Graph below shows profit and loss percentage of two companies in different years:
%profit= (Income-exp)x100/Exp
% loss= (Exp- Income)x100/Exp
Question 8
Direction: Read the following information carefully and answer the following question: The Graph below shows profit and loss percentage of two companies in different years:
%profit= (Income-exp)x100/Exp
% loss= (Exp- Income)x100/Exp
Question 9
Direction: Read the following information carefully and answer the following question: The Graph below shows profit and loss percentage of two companies in different years:
%profit= (Income-exp)x100/Exp
% loss= (Exp- Income)x100/Exp
Question 10
Direction: Read the following information carefully and answer the following question: The Graph below shows profit and loss percentage of two companies in different years:
%profit= (Income-exp)x100/Exp
% loss= (Exp- Income)x100/Exp
Question 11
Step 1: if an even number is followed by a perfect cube then the resultant will be the addition of the cube number and the even number.
Step 2: if an even number is followed by an odd number (not a perfect cube) then the resultant will be the multiplication of both the numbers.
Step 3: if an odd number is followed by another odd number then the resultant will be the addition of both the numbers.
Step 4: if an odd number is followed by an even number then the resultant will be the remainder obtained by dividing the larger number with the smaller number.
Step 5: if an even number is followed by another even number then the resultant comes by subtracting the smaller number from the larger number.
Note: 1 will not count as perfect cube but as an odd number.
Find the resultant of second row if X is the resultant of first row.
Question 12
Step 1: if an even number is followed by a perfect cube then the resultant will be the addition of the cube number and the even number.
Step 2: if an even number is followed by an odd number (not a perfect cube) then the resultant will be the multiplication of both the numbers.
Step 3: if an odd number is followed by another odd number then the resultant will be the addition of both the numbers.
Step 4: if an odd number is followed by an even number then the resultant will be the remainder obtained by dividing the larger number with the smaller number.
Step 5: if an even number is followed by another even number then the resultant comes by subtracting the smaller number from the larger number.
Note: 1 will not count as perfect cube but as an odd number.
Find the sum of the resultant of two rows if X is the resultant of second row.
Question 13
Step 1: if an even number is followed by a perfect cube then the resultant will be the addition of the cube number and the even number.
Step 2: if an even number is followed by an odd number (not a perfect cube) then the resultant will be the multiplication of both the numbers.
Step 3: if an odd number is followed by another odd number then the resultant will be the addition of both the numbers.
Step 4: if an odd number is followed by an even number then the resultant will be the remainder obtained by dividing the larger number with the smaller number.
Step 5: if an even number is followed by another even number then the resultant comes by subtracting the smaller number from the larger number.
Note: 1 will not count as perfect cube but as an odd number.
Find the sum of resultant of two rows.
Question 14
Step 1: if an even number is followed by a perfect cube then the resultant will be the addition of the cube number and the even number.
Step 2: if an even number is followed by an odd number (not a perfect cube) then the resultant will be the multiplication of both the numbers.
Step 3: if an odd number is followed by another odd number then the resultant will be the addition of both the numbers.
Step 4: if an odd number is followed by an even number then the resultant will be the remainder obtained by dividing the larger number with the smaller number.
Step 5: if an even number is followed by another even number then the resultant comes by subtracting the smaller number from the larger number.
Note: 1 will not count as perfect cube but as an odd number.
Find the average the resultants of both the rows.
Question 15
Step 1: if an even number is followed by a perfect cube then the resultant will be the addition of the cube number and the even number.
Step 2: if an even number is followed by an odd number (not a perfect cube) then the resultant will be the multiplication of both the numbers.
Step 3: if an odd number is followed by another odd number then the resultant will be the addition of both the numbers.
Step 4: if an odd number is followed by an even number then the resultant will be the remainder obtained by dividing the larger number with the smaller number.
Step 5: if an even number is followed by another even number then the resultant comes by subtracting the smaller number from the larger number.
Note: 1 will not count as perfect cube but as an odd number.
If the sum of the resultants of two rows is 18, then find the value of X considering positive integer values for all.
Question 16
Question 17
Question 18
Question 19
- 925 attempts
- 6 upvotes
- 3 comments