Mega Quiz 11 and weekly revision || VARC || CAT 2021 || 30 May
Attempt now to get your rank among 238 students!
Question 1
It would be wonderful if the growing protests against class, ethnic and gender discrimination are the start of a transition to a radically better society. But that means recognising that inequality and social hierarchy are fundamental to division and discrimination. The prejudices wax and wane with differences in income, wealth and power.
Following his election victory, John Major said he wanted to create a classless society; he failed because he did nothing about inequality. In contrast, Per Albin Hansson, a former Swedish prime minister, made a similar commitment but was partially successful because he and his successors did reduce income differences.
As research shows, bigger economic differences make class and status more important. Underpinning intolerance and prejudice, they not only become the measure of a person’s worth, they also weaken community life, reduce child wellbeing and make equal opportunities an ever more distant prospect. At the same time, violence increases and health suffers. But reduce inequality and all these outcomes improve.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies report showing that ethnic minorities are under-represented among economists at leading universities misses a chance to focus more on the gender/ethnicity/social class nexus of under-representation that Rethinking Economics has uncovered for our forthcoming book on the need to democratise economics.
In 2018-19, 41% of UK undergraduates in economics at Russell Group universities came from the highest-earning households, while they only represented 15% of the population (according to the Office for National Statistics). Students from the poorest households accounted for about 2% of these undergraduates but made up 6% of the population.
Let’s highlight the interweaving barriers of sexism, racism and elitism which mean that poorer people, particularly those who are black Caribbean, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and women, are severely under-represented among economists.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2020/oct/27/the-need-to-improve-access-to-universities
What would lead to the recognition of inequality and social hierarchy a reason behind discrimination and division?
I. A transition to a better society via protests against class, ethnic and gender discrimination
II. Constant protests against inequality in society at different levels
III. Bringing together people from all walks of life to stand against discrimination
Question 2
It would be wonderful if the growing protests against class, ethnic and gender discrimination are the start of a transition to a radically better society. But that means recognising that inequality and social hierarchy are fundamental to division and discrimination. The prejudices wax and wane with differences in income, wealth and power.
Following his election victory, John Major said he wanted to create a classless society; he failed because he did nothing about inequality. In contrast, Per Albin Hansson, a former Swedish prime minister, made a similar commitment but was partially successful because he and his successors did reduce income differences.
As research shows, bigger economic differences make class and status more important. Underpinning intolerance and prejudice, they not only become the measure of a person’s worth, they also weaken community life, reduce child wellbeing and make equal opportunities an ever more distant prospect. At the same time, violence increases and health suffers. But reduce inequality and all these outcomes improve.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies report showing that ethnic minorities are under-represented among economists at leading universities misses a chance to focus more on the gender/ethnicity/social class nexus of under-representation that Rethinking Economics has uncovered for our forthcoming book on the need to democratise economics.
In 2018-19, 41% of UK undergraduates in economics at Russell Group universities came from the highest-earning households, while they only represented 15% of the population (according to the Office for National Statistics). Students from the poorest households accounted for about 2% of these undergraduates but made up 6% of the population.
Let’s highlight the interweaving barriers of sexism, racism and elitism which mean that poorer people, particularly those who are black Caribbean, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and women, are severely under-represented among economists.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2020/oct/27/the-need-to-improve-access-to-universities
I. Discrimination is the only cause behind gaps at different levels in a society
II. A classless society can only be created through a reduction in inequality
III. Inequality should be eradicated as soon as possible for a better future
Question 3
It would be wonderful if the growing protests against class, ethnic and gender discrimination are the start of a transition to a radically better society. But that means recognising that inequality and social hierarchy are fundamental to division and discrimination. The prejudices wax and wane with differences in income, wealth and power.
Following his election victory, John Major said he wanted to create a classless society; he failed because he did nothing about inequality. In contrast, Per Albin Hansson, a former Swedish prime minister, made a similar commitment but was partially successful because he and his successors did reduce income differences.
As research shows, bigger economic differences make class and status more important. Underpinning intolerance and prejudice, they not only become the measure of a person’s worth, they also weaken community life, reduce child wellbeing and make equal opportunities an ever more distant prospect. At the same time, violence increases and health suffers. But reduce inequality and all these outcomes improve.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies report showing that ethnic minorities are under-represented among economists at leading universities misses a chance to focus more on the gender/ethnicity/social class nexus of under-representation that Rethinking Economics has uncovered for our forthcoming book on the need to democratise economics.
In 2018-19, 41% of UK undergraduates in economics at Russell Group universities came from the highest-earning households, while they only represented 15% of the population (according to the Office for National Statistics). Students from the poorest households accounted for about 2% of these undergraduates but made up 6% of the population.
Let’s highlight the interweaving barriers of sexism, racism and elitism which mean that poorer people, particularly those who are black Caribbean, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and women, are severely under-represented among economists.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2020/oct/27/the-need-to-improve-access-to-universities
Question 4
It would be wonderful if the growing protests against class, ethnic and gender discrimination are the start of a transition to a radically better society. But that means recognising that inequality and social hierarchy are fundamental to division and discrimination. The prejudices wax and wane with differences in income, wealth and power.
Following his election victory, John Major said he wanted to create a classless society; he failed because he did nothing about inequality. In contrast, Per Albin Hansson, a former Swedish prime minister, made a similar commitment but was partially successful because he and his successors did reduce income differences.
As research shows, bigger economic differences make class and status more important. Underpinning intolerance and prejudice, they not only become the measure of a person’s worth, they also weaken community life, reduce child wellbeing and make equal opportunities an ever more distant prospect. At the same time, violence increases and health suffers. But reduce inequality and all these outcomes improve.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies report showing that ethnic minorities are under-represented among economists at leading universities misses a chance to focus more on the gender/ethnicity/social class nexus of under-representation that Rethinking Economics has uncovered for our forthcoming book on the need to democratise economics.
In 2018-19, 41% of UK undergraduates in economics at Russell Group universities came from the highest-earning households, while they only represented 15% of the population (according to the Office for National Statistics). Students from the poorest households accounted for about 2% of these undergraduates but made up 6% of the population.
Let’s highlight the interweaving barriers of sexism, racism and elitism which mean that poorer people, particularly those who are black Caribbean, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and women, are severely under-represented among economists.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2020/oct/27/the-need-to-improve-access-to-universities
Question 5
It would be wonderful if the growing protests against class, ethnic and gender discrimination are the start of a transition to a radically better society. But that means recognising that inequality and social hierarchy are fundamental to division and discrimination. The prejudices wax and wane with differences in income, wealth and power.
Following his election victory, John Major said he wanted to create a classless society; he failed because he did nothing about inequality. In contrast, Per Albin Hansson, a former Swedish prime minister, made a similar commitment but was partially successful because he and his successors did reduce income differences.
As research shows, bigger economic differences make class and status more important. Underpinning intolerance and prejudice, they not only become the measure of a person’s worth, they also weaken community life, reduce child wellbeing and make equal opportunities an ever more distant prospect. At the same time, violence increases and health suffers. But reduce inequality and all these outcomes improve.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies report showing that ethnic minorities are under-represented among economists at leading universities misses a chance to focus more on the gender/ethnicity/social class nexus of under-representation that Rethinking Economics has uncovered for our forthcoming book on the need to democratise economics.
In 2018-19, 41% of UK undergraduates in economics at Russell Group universities came from the highest-earning households, while they only represented 15% of the population (according to the Office for National Statistics). Students from the poorest households accounted for about 2% of these undergraduates but made up 6% of the population.
Let’s highlight the interweaving barriers of sexism, racism and elitism which mean that poorer people, particularly those who are black Caribbean, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and women, are severely under-represented among economists.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2020/oct/27/the-need-to-improve-access-to-universities
Question 6
Question 7
Question 8
A) allowing gatherings to take place
B) even as concerns grew
C) for being slow to acknowledge the outbreak,
D) China has come under fire
E) and punishing doctors for warning others
Question 9
A) in the Champions League final in Kiev in 2018,
B) a run unmatched in 50 years
C) Bale came on as a sub and produced an absurd overhead kick
D) his and Madrid’s fourth Champions League in five years,
E) before scoring a second that clinched
Question 10
A) bigger and more intense fires across the American West
B) climate change has inexorably stacked
C) science has incontrovertibly shown
D) the deck in favor of
E) over the past few decades,
- 238 attempts
- 1 upvote
- 7 comments